Here’s this week’s:
1. Who is your favorite singer/musician? Why?
I don’t really have any one favorite, I do have several that I find I like the majority of their music (not to mention a few that aren’t mentioned there, I just try to keep my lists of ‘favorites’ <= five at all times), but I like lots of other individual stuff a whole lot as well.
Basically, what I like really depends largely on what I’m in the mood for. Yesterday, for instance I was really in the mood for William Shatner music :)
2. What one singer/musician can you not stand? Why?
I am really not a fan of Dave Matthews at all, not necessarily because I think their music is bad but because of negative associations developed in my freshman dorm. I also really dislike boy bands, but that is because of quality :)
3. If your favorite singer wasn’t in the music business, do you think you would still like him/her as a person?
I don’t follow any individual singers closely enough to answer this. Frankly, I don’t give a damn :)
4. Have you been to any concerts? If yes, who put on the best show?
Yes, I’ve been to a few: the Bacon Brothers, the Beach Boys, Jimmy Buffet, and Flogging Molly, to name a few (not to mention a few ska/punk shows). I’d have to say that out of these, the performances I most enjoyed were Flogging Molly and Professor Plum (a local NJ Ska band,now defunct). Most of the others I actually had no interest in seeing, it just kind of…. happened :)
5. What are your thoughts on downloading free music online vs. purchasing albums? Do you feel the RIAA is right in its pursuit to stop people from dowloading free music?
I have no problems buying music if I feel I am buying a quality product. I have never regretted buying a Flogging Molly album, for instance, they are quality products and I am satisfied. Compare bands like Harvey Danger, and other one-hit wonders. This stuff pollutes the radio airwaves, and while some of it is catchy, those songs are usually found on substandard albums that I don’t even want to admit I own only 3 months later.
Now, both of these cost approximately the same- $15-$18 dollars/album. I see a problem with that. Quality has nothing to do with price, neither do the raw materials involved ($0.02?). I want to get my money’s worth, and I usually don’t with most of the music available these days.
Another big issue I have is that very little of the money goes to the actual artist… most of it goes to the record label. I think that in this day and age, record labels are deprecated entities- they exist but don’t really serve any meaningful purpose anymore. Once upon a time they got music out to people who would have no other way of hearing it, but now the media is so cheap it is possible to circulate music without them (meaning actual good music may flourish, instead of what some record exec thinks would do well on MTV).
Basically when we buy CDs we are paying an elephantine organization to do nothing but exist and perpetuate horrid music. It would be much more prudent to support the actual artists you appreciate, either directly through merchandise sales or indirectly through concert tickets.
Consequentially, I don’t think it is necessarily immoral to download music, especially if one is using the downloaded songs as a sample to determine whether they like more than just an artists ‘popular’ songs, and hence whether an ablum would be worth the inflated price. If you find yourself downloading a lot of music by a particular artist, and you have the means, then yes- you should buy the album. If you only have a few songs, then no- it’s not worth it. Maybe this will pass along the hint that only good bands turn a profit, so the bad ones will be less prevalent……. naaaah. People in general, especially teenagers (also in general), don’t work that way- if they are told something is popular and good, they buy it :)
On the other hand, downloading hoards of music and never buying any of it (assuming you are financially capable of buying it {and if you are not capable now, you should buy it later on when you are}) is wrong. That’s just stealing, there’s no way around it.
Putting all this together: Is the RIAA wrong? Yes, by virtue of them being the RIAA, their existence is wrong. But, seeing as they already exist, blatantly taking everything you can for free is also wrong. Punishing filesharers or outlawing filesharing is not the way to fix this however- if you want the problem to go away, you first must address the root cause. Make CD prices fair, in regards to the quality of the content, and I believe a large majority of the problem will start to right itself.
p.s. Oh, and blaming decreased sales on filesharing is
1. ignoring the real problem (increased ratio crap : not crap)
2. using an unfortunate economic crisis for your own twisted and evil purposes. For shame.